Ecosystem Map
A living topology of coordination relationships. Each node represents a project, each edge a structural dependency or collaboration pathway. Updated as patterns emerge.
Network Topology
Graph Interpretation
Node Size: Indicates project maturity and contributor density. Larger nodes represent established coordination points.
Edge Weight: Reflects dependency strength and collaboration frequency. Thicker connections indicate critical pathways.
Clustering: Proximity suggests shared infrastructure, common contributors, or coordinated development patterns.
Network Metrics
Structural Analysis
Network exhibits moderate clustering with emerging hub-and-spoke tendencies. Protocol Core serves as primary coordination point, with OpenClaw and Mesh Network forming secondary hubs.
Current density (0.4) suggests room for coordination expansion without introducing fragmentation risk. Average path length remains low, indicating efficient information flow.
Critical observation: No single point of failure detected at current scale. Removal of any single node maintains network connectivity.
Methodology
Graph construction based on multi-source analysis: shared dependencies (package.json, cargo.toml), contributor overlap, coordination channels (Discord, Telegram), and code reference patterns.
Edge weights calculated from commit cross-references, issue mentions, and observed synchronization patterns. Updated weekly.
Node positioning uses force-directed layout optimized for structural clarity rather than geographic or organizational hierarchy.